Sterling v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

262 A.D. 930, 28 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6515

This text of 262 A.D. 930 (Sterling v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sterling v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp., 262 A.D. 930, 28 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Plaintiffs have the record title to a one-quarter interest in the premises involved in this action, and the defendants Chahoon have the record title to the other three-quarter interest. Plaintiff brought this action against defendant New York State Electric & Gas Corporation and defendants Chahoon because of the diversion of the waters of the Ausable river from their natural channel in front of plaintiff’s premises. On the trial defendants contended that the plaintiffs’ deeds are champertous and also that the defendants are the owners of the entire property by adverse possession. The trial court found that the defendants /failed to sustain these allegations as to those defenses. The evidence justifies the conclusion of the trial court. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from diverting the waters but suspended the operation of the judgment indefinitely. The trial court also failed to find that plaintiffs are entitled to damages by reason of the diversion of the waters. Plaintiffs are entitled to damages. The case should be remitted to the trial court to ascertain and fix the damages to which the plaintiffs are entitled. The injunction should be suspended for a period of one year for that purpose. If the time is not sufficient, then an application may be made to this court to suspend the injunction for such additional time as may be necessary. The judgment as thus modified is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 930, 28 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-v-new-york-state-electric-gas-corp-nyappdiv-1941.