Sterling v. Hollerith

5 So. 2d 858, 149 Fla. 400, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 786

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 27, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We consider motion to dismiss appeal because same is without merit and is frivolous.

The order appealed from is one confirming sale under foreclosure decree which has become absolute and from which no appeal was taken.

An examination of the record shows the appeal to be without merit and it is, therefore, dismissed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We consider motion to dismiss appeal because same is without merit and is frivolous.

The order appealed from is one confirming sale under foreclosure decree which has become absolute and from which no appeal was taken.

An examination of the record shows the appeal to be without merit and it is, therefore, dismissed.

So ordered.

BROWN, C. J., WHITFIELD, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Sterling v. Hollerith, 5 So. 2d 858, 149 Fla. 400, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 786 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

5 So. 2d 858 (Sterling v. Hollerith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.