Sterling v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustss for Femit Trust 2006-FF6, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates, Series 2006-F6

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EVERTON STERLING, 9 Plaintiff, : -against- : DECISION AND ORDER DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY. AS TRUSTEE FOR FEMIT TRUST 2006-FF6, et al. ' 19 Civ. 205 (GBD) (TW) Defendants,

ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eee eee eee ee ee XX GEORGE B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Pro se Plaintiff moves for reconsideration, (ECF No. 181), and to vacate as void, (ECF No. 190), thi Court’s Memorandum Decision and Order dismissing his claims by summary judgment. (ECF. 180) To prevail on a motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff must identify “an intervening change of controllin; law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Kole Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Tr., 729 F.3d 99, 108 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting Virgin Atl Airways, Ltd. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd. , 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir. 1992). A judgment is void “only if the cour that rendered it lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or if it acted in a manner inconsisten with due process of law.” Grace v. Bank Leumi Tr. Co., 443 F.3d 180, 193 (2d Cir. 2006) (quoting Tex/on Corp y, Mfrs. Hanover Commercial Corp., 596 F.2d 1092, 1099 (2d Cir, 1979)), Plaintiff has not met either standard and has failed to articulate any basis for relief. Thus, □□□□□□□□□□ motions are DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the open motions at ECF Nos, 181 and 190 and this case.

Dated: September 28, 2023 New York, New York SO ORDERED.

RGR. DANIELS Mrited States District Judge