Sterling v. City of Jackson
Opinion
Case: 24-60370 Document: 154-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/19/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED February 19, 2026
No. 24-60370 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk
Priscilla Sterling, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Raine Becker, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Shawn Miller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; John Bennett,
Plaintiffs—Appellants,
versus
The City of Jackson, Mississippi; Chokwe A. Lumumba; Tony Yarber; Kishia Powell; Robert Miller; Jerriot Smash; Trilogy Engineering Services, L.L.C.,
Defendants—Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:22-CV-531
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion November 17, 2025, 5 Cir., 2025, 159 F.4th 361)
Before Elrod, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Richman, Haynes, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.*
Case: 24-60370 Document: 154-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/19/2026
No. 24-60370
Per Curiam:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated November 17, 2025, is VACATED.
*Judge Southwick and Judge Graves did not participate in the consideration of the rehearing en banc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sterling v. City of Jackson (Sterling v. City of Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.