Sterling v. Chapin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sterling v. Chapin

111 A.D. 912

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sterling v. Chapin. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 N.Y.S. 904 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1906·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order, appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. .And upon the authority of Sterling v. Chapin (102 App. Div. 689) the judgment appealed, from should also be affirmed, without costs. Present— O'Brien, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented on his opinion on the previous appeal. Order affirmed, without costs. Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order, appealed from should be affirmed, without costs. .And upon the authority of Sterling v. Chapin (102 App. Div. 689) the judgment appealed, from should also be affirmed, without costs. Present— O'Brien, P. J., Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke and Houghton, JJ.; Laughlin, J., dissented on his opinion on the previous appeal. Order affirmed, without costs. Judgment affirmed, without costs.

Sterling v. Chapin, 111 A.D. 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

111 A.D. 912 (Sterling v. Chapin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.