Sterling Fifty-Six, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank of Davie
278 So. 2d 638, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8075
Opinion
On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument, we are of the opinion that no reversible error [639]*639has been demonstrated as to the sale of the property or confirmation thereof between the plaintiff-bank and the Appellee-Solomon. The judgment of the trial court is thus affirmed, without prejudice to any claim that Procacci may have against Solomon arising out of the corporate capacity of the parties involved.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sterling Fifty-Six, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank of Davie, 278 So. 2d 638, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
278 So. 2d 638 (Sterling Fifty-Six, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank of Davie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Procacci v. Solomon
317 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)