Sterling Fifty-Six, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank of Davie
This text of 278 So. 2d 638 (Sterling Fifty-Six, Inc. v. Sterling National Bank of Davie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument, we are of the opinion that no reversible error [639]*639has been demonstrated as to the sale of the property or confirmation thereof between the plaintiff-bank and the Appellee-Solomon. The judgment of the trial court is thus affirmed, without prejudice to any claim that Procacci may have against Solomon arising out of the corporate capacity of the parties involved.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 So. 2d 638, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-fifty-six-inc-v-sterling-national-bank-of-davie-fladistctapp-1973.