Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 2020·No. 160160·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

160160 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

STERLING BENEFITS, LLC, STERLING Richard H. Bernstein AGENCY, INC., JOSEPH HANEY and Elizabeth T. Clement PAUL MATTES, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and BOSQUETT & COMPANY, Plaintiff,

v SC: 160160 COA: 342529 Oakland CC: 2009-103556-CK DAVID FISCHER and BOSQUETT & COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants,

and

BARRY D. PAULSELL, GORDON ST. JOHN, CONRAD CONTI, JOSEPH (JOE) HANEY, STERLING INSURANCE GROUP and RALPH C. WILSON AGENCY, Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2020

t0122

Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer, (Mich. 2020).

Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer (Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.