Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
January 29, 2020 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
160160 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem
Stephen J. Markman
Brian K. Zahra
STERLING BENEFITS, LLC, STERLING Richard H. Bernstein AGENCY, INC., JOSEPH HANEY and Elizabeth T. Clement PAUL MATTES, Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
and BOSQUETT & COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v SC: 160160 COA: 342529 Oakland CC: 2009-103556-CK DAVID FISCHER and BOSQUETT & COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants,
and
BARRY D. PAULSELL, GORDON ST. JOHN, CONRAD CONTI, JOSEPH (JOE) HANEY, STERLING INSURANCE GROUP and RALPH C. WILSON AGENCY, Defendants.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2019 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
January 29, 2020
t0122
Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer (Sterling Benefits LLC v. David Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.