Sterling Allen v. State
This text of Sterling Allen v. State (Sterling Allen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-11-00097-CR
Ex parte Sterling Allen
&
NO. 03-11-00417-CR
Sterling Allen, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C-R-10-0659-HC, HONORABLE DAN R. BECK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Sterling Allen has been charged with the offenses of forgery, evading arrest
with a motor vehicle, and tampering with physical evidence. In each of the above causes, Allen has
filed a pro se notice of appeal from the district court’s order denying Allen’s pretrial application for
writ of habeas corpus. We have now received from Allen a motion to dismiss in which he represents
that he has pleaded guilty to the underlying offenses and asks us to dismiss his appeals. In each of
the above causes, we grant appellant’s motion. The appeals are dismissed. __________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion
Filed: February 17, 2012
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sterling Allen v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sterling-allen-v-state-texapp-2012.