Steptor v. State
871 S.W.2d 134, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 341, 1994 WL 57593
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Paul Steptor, appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for assault in the first degree for which movant was sentenced to imprisonment for thirty years.
[135]*135The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Steptor v. State, 871 S.W.2d 134, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 341, 1994 WL 57593 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
871 S.W.2d 134 (Steptor v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.