Stepp v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
727 P.2d 125, 302 Or. 148
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1986·No. WCB 83-01242; CA A34646; SC S32946·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We allow the petition for reconsideration and the petition for review.
Having concluded that this case presents, as one of the primary issues, the same question presented in Smith v. SAIF, 302 Or 109, 727 P2d 123 (1986), we hereby remand this case to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of our decision in Smith v. SAIF, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stepp v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp., 727 P.2d 125, 302 Or. 148 (Or. 1986).
727 P.2d 125 (Stepp v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stepp v. SAIF Corp.
745 P.2d 1207 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1987)