Stepp v. Holland
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2433
BENNIE E. STEPP,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL H. HOLLAND; B. V. HYLER; STEVE SCHAAB; MARTY HUDSON, Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Plan and Trust; UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1974 PENSION PLAN AND TRUST,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-04-1062-5)
Submitted: May 22, 2006 Decided: July 12, 2006
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome J. McFadden, Princeton, West Virginia, for Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel, Christopher F. Clarke, Senior Assistant General Counsel, UMWA HEALTH AND RETIREMENT FUNDS, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bennie Stepp appeals from the district court’s opinion and
order upholding the decision by the Trustees of the United Mine
Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust denying disability benefits.
Stepp asserts that the Trustees’ determination that there was no
causal link between his mine injury and his disability constituted
an abuse of discretion. After reviewing the record de novo, we
find that the Trustees did not abuse their discretion in denying
disability benefits. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. See Stepp v. Holland, No. 5:04-cv-01062 (S.D. W.
Va. Nov. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral arguments because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stepp v. Holland (Stepp v. Holland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.