Steponik v. State

149 So. 3d 1156, 2014 WL 5351026
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 22, 2014
Docket2D13-3789
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 3d 1156 (Steponik v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Steponik v. State, 149 So. 3d 1156, 2014 WL 5351026 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

. Jessica D. Steponik appeals the order revoking her probation. We affirm the revocation and her amended sentence in all respects. We write only to note that the trial court entered the amended sentence prior to the trial court clerk’s issuance of the commitment package for the Department of Corrections, but the commitment *1157 package that is contained in our appellate record does not include the amended sentencing document. The amended sentence substantially increased Ms. Steponik’s credit for time served. The sentencing document contained in the commitment package in our record was signed on July 23, 2013, and it reflected an award of 230 days of credit for time Ms. Steponik was incarcerated before imposition of the sentence. The amended sentence was signed on July 25, 2013, and it reflected an award of 319 days of credit for time incarcerated before imposition of the sentence. Thus, the Department should calculate Ms. Step-onik’s release date based on the amended sentence if it has not already done so.

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, CASANUEVA, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 3d 1156, 2014 WL 5351026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steponik-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.