Stepney v. State
This text of 195 S.W.3d 11 (Stepney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Robin Stepney appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
*12 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 S.W.3d 11, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 940, 2006 WL 1736218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stepney-v-state-moctapp-2006.