Stepney v. State

92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 188, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 794
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1917
Docket8759
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 955 (Stepney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stepney v. State, 92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 188, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 794 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Wade, O. J.

The jury, who are the final judges of the credibility of witnesses (Smith v. State, 15 Ga. App. 713, 715, 716 (84 S. E. 159), and cases there cited), having, as appears from their verdict, accepted as true the evidence of the sole witness for the State, which clearly established the defendant’s guilt, the court did not err in refusing a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence, and without evidence to support it.

Judgment affirmed.

George and Lulce, JJ., concur. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Sparta—Judge Moore. February 14, 1917. B. H. Lewis, for plaintiff in error. B. L. Merritt, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
84 S.E. 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.E. 955, 20 Ga. App. 188, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stepney-v-state-gactapp-1917.