Stepney v. Beckwith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6979

WADE STEPNEY, JR., a/k/a Wade Stephney, Jr., a/k/a Wade Stephney, a/k/a Wade Stepheny, Jr.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

D. BECKWITH, SCDC Warden, Wateree River Correctional Institution; DEPUTY WARDEN BLANDING; MAJOR BOGGS; CAPTAIN GASDEN; LIEUTENANT BROWN; SERGEANT DAVIS; SERGEANT HOOSIER,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:09-cv-00771-MBS)

Submitted: July 30, 2010 Decided: August 23, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wade Stepney, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Wade Stepney, Jr. appeals the district court’s orders

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Stepney v. Beckwith, No. 8:09-cv-00771-MBS (D.S.C.

Jan. 21, 2010; May 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED