Stephon v. Jirik

228 N.W. 336, 179 Minn. 582, 1929 Minn. LEXIS 958
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 20, 1929·No. No. 27,576.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only error assigned is that the court erred in denying a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. On that point the case is ruled by the decision in State v. Upson, 162 Minn. 9, 201 N. W. 913. There was no abuse of discretion, and the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephon v. Jirik, 228 N.W. 336, 179 Minn. 582, 1929 Minn. LEXIS 958 (Mich. 1929).

228 N.W. 336 (Stephon v. Jirik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Upson
201 N.W. 913 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)