Stephney v. Lott

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2006·No. 06-6897·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6897

WADE STEPHNEY, a/k/a Wade Stephney, Jr.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LEON LOTT, JR., Sheriff of Richland County; J. WILLOUGHBY, Investigator for Richland County Sheriff's Department; RONALDO D. MYERS, Director of Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center; HAYHURST, Fugitive Squad Officer for Richland County Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNKNOWN FUGITIVE SQUAD OFFICER, Richland County Sheriff’s Department,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02740-MBS)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wade Stephney, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Wade Stephney appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Stephney v. Lott,

No. 8:05-cv-02740-MBS (D.S.C. May 9, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephney v. Lott, (4th Cir. 2006).

Stephney v. Lott (Stephney v. Lott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related