Stephentown Concerned Citizens v. Herrick

756 N.E.2d 72, 96 N.Y.2d 881, 730 N.Y.S.2d 784, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 1938
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 2, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 756 N.E.2d 72 (Stephentown Concerned Citizens v. Herrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephentown Concerned Citizens v. Herrick, 756 N.E.2d 72, 96 N.Y.2d 881, 730 N.Y.S.2d 784, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 1938 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against respondents Dean Herrick, Michael Angley, Town Board of the Town of Stephentown and the Town of Stephentown, dismissed as untimely (see, CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judge Graffeo taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
756 N.E.2d 72, 96 N.Y.2d 881, 730 N.Y.S.2d 784, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 1938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephentown-concerned-citizens-v-herrick-ny-2001.