Stephenson v. Stephenson

71 Mo. 127
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 71 Mo. 127 (Stephenson v. Stephenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephenson v. Stephenson, 71 Mo. 127 (Mo. 1879).

Opinion

Hough, J.

This was an action of ejectment. The plaintiff claimed title under the swamp land grant of September 28th, 1850, and the defendant under the railroad grant of June 10th, 1852. The ease was tried on the theory that it was only necessary for the .plaintiff to show that the land sued for was in fact swamp land on the 28th day of September, 1850. The fact that it was swamp land at that date within the meaning of the act o'f Congress, would be sufficient to show that it was not included in the railroad grant of 1852. But that fact was not of itself sufficient to confer title upon the State, or the county claiming by grant from the State. In order,that the title might vest in the county, it was necessary that the tract in question should have been selected as swamp land, and such selection must have been approved by the Secretary of the In[128]*128terior, or if not so approved, the tract must fall within the provisions of the act of Congress of March 3rd, 1857. No claim was made under the act of 1857, but a certificate of the Register of Lands was offered in evidence, bearing date June 9th, 1874, to the effect that the land sued for was on a list of swamp lands in Macon county, on file in his office. This certificate, however, fails to show that said land had ever been confirmed as swamp land, but on the contrary, it shows that it had been “ approved to the railroad.” This certificate, therefore, could not be prima facie evidence of title in the county, as provided in section 9, 2 Wagner’s Statutes, page 868. The lists referred to in this section, are lists of swamp lands which have received the approval of the proper authorities of the United States. The judgment of the circuit court must be reversed and the cause remanded.

All concur, except Henry, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lundry
233 S.W.2d 734 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1950)
Harvey v. Anderson
31 S.W. 592 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
State v. Portsmouth Savings Bank
7 N.E. 379 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
Sturgeon v. Hampton
88 Mo. 203 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1885)
Jasper County v. Wadlow
82 Mo. 172 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Prior v. Lambeth
78 Mo. 538 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)
Palmer v. Boorn
80 Mo. 99 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 Mo. 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephenson-v-stephenson-mo-1879.