Stephenson v. Stephenson

176 So. 2d 100, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4242
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1965·No. No. 4125·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant herein seeks review, by plenarj' appeal, of an order reinstating a cause dismissed for lack of prosecution. The order is an interlocutory one from which plenary appeal does not lie. While this Court has, in the exercise of its discretion, treated plenary appeals from interlocutory orders in equity as if they had been brought by interlocutory appeal, we did so under circumstances materially different from those of the instant case. Washington Security Co. v. Tracy’s Plumbing & Pumps, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 680.

The appeal is dismissed. Finnneran v. Finneran, Fla.App.1962, 137 So.2d 844, cert. denied Fla., 150 So.2d 444.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., SHANNON, J., and DURDEN, WILLIAM L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephenson v. Stephenson, 176 So. 2d 100, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4242 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

176 So. 2d 100 (Stephenson v. Stephenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Washington SEC. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc.
166 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Finneran v. Finneran
137 So. 2d 844 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)