Stephenson v. Stephenson
This text of 176 So. 2d 100 (Stephenson v. Stephenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant herein seeks review, by plenarj' appeal, of an order reinstating a cause dismissed for lack of prosecution. The order is an interlocutory one from which plenary appeal does not lie. While this Court has, in the exercise of its discretion, treated plenary appeals from interlocutory orders in equity as if they had been brought by interlocutory appeal, we did so under circumstances materially different from those of the instant case. Washington Security Co. v. Tracy’s Plumbing & Pumps, Inc., Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 680.
The appeal is dismissed. Finnneran v. Finneran, Fla.App.1962, 137 So.2d 844, cert. denied Fla., 150 So.2d 444.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 So. 2d 100, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephenson-v-stephenson-fladistctapp-1965.