Stephenson v. State

25 S.W. 784, 33 Tex. Crim. 162, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 65
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 28, 1894·No. No. 204.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

*163 ON MOTION FOB. BEHEABING.

SIMKINS, Judge.

Appellant moves for a rebearing on tbe ground of tbe insufficiency of tbe evidence to sustain a conviction for an aggravated assault. A re-examination satisfies us that tbe motion should be granted. Tbe record shows that appellant struck Phillips on tbe side of tbe bead with tbe pistol; that tbe pistol fired accidentally at tbe time of tbe blow, catting out a piece of Phillips’ ear, and slightly powder-burning bis face. Tbe record fails to show tbe size or weight of tbe pistol, or that any injury was inflicted on Phillips from its use as a bludgeon, except the accidental result above stated. In Pierce’s case, 21 Texas Criminal Appeals, 548, it was held, that where a pistol is used to strike with, tbe assault would not be aggravated unless it is shown that tbe pistol, in tbe manner in which it was used, was a deadly weapon, or that by its use serious bodily injury was inflicted. Melton v. The State, 30 Texas Crim. App., 273; Wilson v. The State, 15 Texas Crim. App., 150; Hunt v. The State, 6 Texas Crim. App., 663.

Tbe rehearing is granted. Tbe judgment is reversed and tbe cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephenson v. State, 25 S.W. 784, 33 Tex. Crim. 162, 1894 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 65 (Tex. 1894).

25 S.W. 784 (Stephenson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
821 S.W.2d 616 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Hilliard v. State
218 S.W. 1052 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Smith v. State
135 S.W. 152 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Hamilton v. State
131 S.W. 1127 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Commonwealth v. Heath
35 S.W. 277 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1896)