Stephenson v. Jacksonville Television, Inc.

908 So. 2d 525, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10999, 2005 WL 1660744
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 18, 2005·No. No. 1D04-2504·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. See Lamb v. Matetzschk, 906 So.2d 1037 (Fla.2005) (“[T]he plain language of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 mandates that offers of settlement be differentiated between the parties, even if a party’s liability is purely vicarious.”).

DAVIS, BENTON, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephenson v. Jacksonville Television, Inc., 908 So. 2d 525, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10999, 2005 WL 1660744 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

908 So. 2d 525 (Stephenson v. Jacksonville Television, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lamb v. Matetzschk
906 So. 2d 1037 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)