Stephenson v. Harden

682 So. 2d 1198, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11939, 1996 WL 656369
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 1996·No. No. 95-3705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s motion for modification of a temporary child support order and the granting of ap-pellee’s emergency motion for contempt. We affirm the former order but reverse the latter and remand because of two omissions therefrom.

First, the trial court failed to recite in the order that appellant had the present ability to pay. Second, the order failed to provide a way for appellant to purge the civil contempt and terminate the sentence, see International Medical Ctrs. v. Colavecchio, 563 So.2d 784, 786 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), thus transforming a civil contempt proceeding into an order in the form of indirect criminal contempt.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephenson v. Harden, 682 So. 2d 1198, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11939, 1996 WL 656369 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

682 So. 2d 1198 (Stephenson v. Harden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shirley v. Shirley
693 So. 2d 699 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)