Stephenson v. Glass

279 S.W. 260, 115 Tex. 192
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 20, 1926·No. Application No. 14419.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While disapproving so much of the opinion of the honorable Court of Civil Appeals (276 S. W. 1110) as holds that the conveyance of the 20 acres passed an undivided interest in the royalty on the entire 884 acres of land, and as holds that there is any conflict between the cited cases decided by the Commission of Appeals, we refuse this petition for writ of error because proper effect was given to the repudiation of the lessees’ obligations under the original lease. The modified lease did not bind any interest of the purchaser of the 20 acres. The lessees could not repudiate or abandon their obligations under the lease of the 884 acres, and retain any rights in and to the 20 acres.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephenson v. Glass, 279 S.W. 260, 115 Tex. 192 (Tex. 1926).

279 S.W. 260 (Stephenson v. Glass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Humble Oil & Refining Company
301 S.W.2d 938 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1957)
Landgrebe v. Rock Hill Oil Company
273 S.W.2d 636 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Thomas Gilcrease Foundation
262 S.W.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Garza v. DeMontalvo
217 S.W.2d 988 (Texas Supreme Court, 1949)
Carlock v. Krug
99 P.2d 858 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1940)