Stephenson v. Gillaspie

Indiana Court of Appeals

Stephenson v. Gillaspie

55 N.E. 106, 23 Ind. App. 187, 1899 Ind. App. LEXIS 33

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided October 31, 1899·No. No. 2,929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

• Black, J. —

The appellant has assigned here that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the second paragraph of the appellee’s reply, and that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the findings' of fact in a special finding. The transcript of the.Record before us does not set forth a final judgment in the cause or show that one was rendered. Thereforé, the questions discussed in the briefs of counsel can not be decided by us in this case. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

• Black, J. —

The appellant has assigned here that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the second paragraph of the appellee’s reply, and that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the findings' of fact in a special finding. The transcript of the.Record before us does not set forth a final judgment in the cause or show that one was rendered. Thereforé, the questions discussed in the briefs of counsel can not be decided by us in this case. Appeal dismissed.

Stephenson v. Gillaspie, 55 N.E. 106, 23 Ind. App. 187, 1899 Ind. App. LEXIS 33 (Ind. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

55 N.E. 106 (Stephenson v. Gillaspie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related