Stephenson v. Gillaspie

Indiana Court of Appeals

Stephenson v. Gillaspie

55 N.E. 106, 23 Ind. App. 187, 1899 Ind. App. LEXIS 33

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 31, 1899

DocketNo. 2,929

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 55 N.E. 106 (Stephenson v. Gillaspie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephenson v. Gillaspie, 55 N.E. 106, 23 Ind. App. 187, 1899 Ind. App. LEXIS 33 (Ind. Ct. App. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

• Black, J. —

The appellant has assigned here that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the second paragraph of the appellee’s reply, and that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the findings' of fact in a special finding. The transcript of the.Record before us does not set forth a final judgment in the cause or show that one was rendered. Thereforé, the questions discussed in the briefs of counsel can not be decided by us in this case. Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

• Black, J. —

The appellant has assigned here that the court erred in overruling his demurrer to the second paragraph of the appellee’s reply, and that the court erred in its conclusions of law upon the findings' of fact in a special finding. The transcript of the.Record before us does not set forth a final judgment in the cause or show that one was rendered. Thereforé, the questions discussed in the briefs of counsel can not be decided by us in this case. Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 N.E. 106, 23 Ind. App. 187, 1899 Ind. App. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephenson-v-gillaspie-indctapp-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack