Stephenson v. Davenport

672 F. App'x 329
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 12, 2017·No. No. 16-6977·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Javon Stephenson appeals the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stephenson v. Davenport, No. 1:14-cv-[330]*33000266-TSE-IDD, 2016 WL 3661304 (E.D. Va. June 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephenson v. Davenport, 672 F. App'x 329 (4th Cir. 2017).

672 F. App'x 329 (Stephenson v. Davenport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related