Stephenson v. Alger

603 A.2d 1126, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 242, 1992 WL 51283
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMarch 19, 1992
DocketNo. 91-446-M.P.
StatusPublished

This text of 603 A.2d 1126 (Stephenson v. Alger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephenson v. Alger, 603 A.2d 1126, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 242, 1992 WL 51283 (R.I. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

This matter was before a panel of the Supreme Court on a petition of defendant for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to review a protective order entered in the Superior Court.

The defendant Edward Alger is charged with and being prosecuted for sexual assault on plaintiff, who is the complaining witness in that criminal prosecution. In this civil suit by the plaintiff arising out of this assault, defendant’s counsel in the civil action scheduled a deposition of the plaintiff and intended to have the defense attorney in the criminal matter attend the deposition. The plaintiff’s attorney moved for a protective order that would bar the criminal defense attorney from attending the deposition in the civil case. The motion calendar justice entered the requested protective order, reasoning that in view of the sensitive nature of the plaintiff’s charges against defendant, presence at the deposition of the criminal defense attorney would be intimidating.

[1127]*1127Subsequent to the entry of the protective order, however, the defense attorney in the criminal matter has now entered his appearance for defendant in the civil action. Under these new circumstances it would be inappropriate, if not constitutionally prohibited, to prevent defendant’s counsel from being present at the deposition that has been scheduled for defendant’s benefit.

For these reasons, the petition for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari is granted, the protective order is quashed, and the papers of the case are remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings.

FAY, C.J., and MURRAY, J„ did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
603 A.2d 1126, 1992 R.I. LEXIS 242, 1992 WL 51283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephenson-v-alger-ri-1992.