Stephenson & Hand v. Shreveport Natatorium & Amusement Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Stephenson & Hand v. Shreveport Natatorium & Amusement Co.

127 So. 427, 13 La. App. 150, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 562

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 10, 1930

DocketNo. 2876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 So. 427 (Stephenson & Hand v. Shreveport Natatorium & Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephenson & Hand v. Shreveport Natatorium & Amusement Co., 127 So. 427, 13 La. App. 150, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 562 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

DREW, J.

This case was fixed regularly for trial in this court, and appellants have made no appearance. They have neither argued the case nor filed brief. There is no error patent on the face of the record, and appellants have pointed out no error in the judgment appealed from.

The judgment is presumed to be correct, and, in the absence of assistance from appellants, this court will not seek to detect errors therein not patent on the face of the record. Bynum vs. Lieber, 155 La. 760, 99 So. 590; Schwan vs. Peterman, 123 La. 732, 49 So. 486; Arkadelphia Milling Co. vs. Anders et al., 5 La. App. 193; Suc. of Suner, 5 La. App. 121; Blasdel vs. McElroy, 7 La. App. 109.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, J.

This case was fixed regularly for trial in this court, and appellants have made no appearance. They have neither argued the case nor filed brief. There is no error patent on the face of the record, and appellants have pointed out no error in the judgment appealed from.

The judgment is presumed to be correct, and, in the absence of assistance from appellants, this court will not seek to detect errors therein not patent on the face of the record. Bynum vs. Lieber, 155 La. 760, 99 So. 590; Schwan vs. Peterman, 123 La. 732, 49 So. 486; Arkadelphia Milling Co. vs. Anders et al., 5 La. App. 193; Suc. of Suner, 5 La. App. 121; Blasdel vs. McElroy, 7 La. App. 109.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the lower court be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 So. 427, 13 La. App. 150, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephenson-hand-v-shreveport-natatorium-amusement-co-lactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack