Stephens v. Wallis

1 Ga. L. Rep. 65
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 65 (Stephens v. Wallis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Wallis, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 65 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Hall, J.

A certiorari does not lie to proceedings before a justice of ■the peace binding over to the Superior Court a-party arrested upon a warrant, either to keep the peace or for his good behavior. While there is no precedent or authority for inserting in such a warrant a direction to the arresting officer to levy upon, and hold the property of the defendant for the payment of costs in case of conviction, and if the officer does so levy and proceed to sell the property, it is without .lawful war■rant or authority ; still, certiorari is not .the proper remedy to restrain this excessive exercise of power. If an affidavit of illegality will not [66]*66lie, a remedy may be bad by the writ of prohibition. Code, §§4749, efr seq., 3209 (a).

J. L. Wimberly & Son ; E. H. Beall; R. F. Watts, for plaintiff im error. No appearance for defendant.

(a) This case differs from that of Hayden vs. State, 40 Ga„ 476.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-wallis-ga-1885.