Stephens v. Van Buren

1 Paige Ch. 479
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedMay 25, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 1 Paige Ch. 479 (Stephens v. Van Buren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Van Buren, 1 Paige Ch. 479 (N.Y. 1829).

Opinion

The Chancellor :—This is a bill filed by infants to recover their share of the estate of their grand-father which was bequeathed to them after the death of their mother. She died about the first of December, 1825 ; at which time the share of the estate belonging to the complainants was $12,724 83. Their guardian applied for the payment of what "was due; but the defendants declined paying it over for some reason which does not appear. The defendants and the guardian have submitted the case for the consideration and decision of this court. As there appears to be nothing in dispute between them, I can see no reason [480]*480for charging these infants with the expense of this suit; and as the executors refused to pay without any excuse for such refusal, I should probably have given the guardian his costs against them if he had asked it. There is one thing, however, manifestly wrong. The executors *have had the money three or four years in their hands, and l without any excuse for retaining it, and yet the guardian does not, in his draft of the decree, even ask them to pay the interest. I cannot suffer him thus to deprive the infants of what appears a fair and equitable claim against the defendants. There must be a reference to a master to ascertain what is due to each of the infants from the defendants; and the master must charge the defendants with the interest which they have received or might have received on such amount, with reasonable diligence, since the death of the mother. The master must also ascertain whether the guardian has given sufficient security to the infants for the faithful execution of his trust; and in judging of such security, he must see that there are two responsible persons, each of whom is worth over and above all debts double the amount of the personal estate of the infants, including interest thereon during their minority, and of the whole amount of the rents and profits of their real estate during that period. The penalty of the bond should be to that extent. On the coming in and confirmation of the report, if it appears the security is sufficient, the defendants must pay the amount reported due to the guardian; and if insufficient, they must pay it into court, to be invested for their benefit by the assistant register until security is given to the satisfaction of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Hartfield
139 Misc. 214 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1931)
Dailey v. Dailey
224 Ill. App. 17 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1922)
Wright v. . Wright
122 N.E. 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Worcester Trust Co. v. Turner
96 N.E. 132 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Disney
118 A.D. 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Thomas v. Thomas
43 Misc. 541 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)
Herzog v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.
69 N.E. 283 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)
In Re Estate of Upham
59 P. 315 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Minkler v. Simons
50 N.E. 176 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1898)
In re Barnes
23 N.Y.S. 600 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1893)
Thurston v. Bishop
7 Haw. 421 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1888)
Church v. Church
23 A. 302 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Manier v. Phelps
15 Abb. N. Cas. 123 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Greer v. Belknap
63 How. Pr. 390 (New York Supreme Court, 1882)
Stark v. Brown
101 Ill. 395 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1882)
Strang v. Strang
4 Redf. 376 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1880)
Phillips v. Dusenberry
15 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 348 (New York Supreme Court, 1876)
Price v. Crone
44 Miss. 571 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1870)
In re the Final Accounting in the Estate of Chapeau
1 Tuck. Surr. 410 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Paige Ch. 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-van-buren-nychanct-1829.