Stephens v. Tipton

15 Ky. 38, 5 Litt. 38, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 21
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided April 9, 1824·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[38] Opinion of the Court,

by Ch. J. Boyle.

IT was error in the circuit court to instruct the jury that unless they should be of opinion that the plaintiff had completed the work covenanted to be done by him, by the time stipulated, they must find for the defendant; because the instruction so given assumes the covenants of the parties to be dependant covenants, where[39] as they ought to be construed to be independent, more especially as there had been a partial performance of the covenant on the part of the plaintiff, and the residue admitted of compensation.

The judgment must be reversed with costs, and the cause be remanded for anew trial to be had.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. Tipton, 15 Ky. 38, 5 Litt. 38, 1824 Ky. LEXIS 21 (Ky. Ct. App. 1824).

15 Ky. 38 (Stephens v. Tipton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Big Run Coal Co. v. Employers' Indemnity Co.
174 S.W. 25 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1915)