Stephens v. State

20 S.W.2d 1115

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stephens v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Tex. Crim. 185 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 16, 1929·No. No. 12817·Published

Opinion

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is unlawfully possessing a still for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is unlawfully possessing a still for the purpose of manufacturing intoxicating liquor; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court. .

Stephens v. State, 20 S.W.2d 1115 (Tex. 1929).

Pincite

20 S.W.2d 1115 (Stephens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.