Stephens v. State

549 So. 2d 187, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 952, 1989 WL 117992
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1989
DocketNo. 71578
StatusPublished

This text of 549 So. 2d 187 (Stephens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. State, 549 So. 2d 187, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 952, 1989 WL 117992 (Fla. 1989).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review Stephens v. State, 513 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), because of apparent conflict with Gurganus v. State, 451 So.2d 817 (Fla.1984), concerning the defense of diminished capacity. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After we accepted jurisdiction, however, we settled the issue in Chestnut v. State, 538 So.2d 820 (Fla.1989). As the opinion in the court below is consistent with Chestnut, we dismiss the petition for review.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, SHAW, BARKETT and GRIMES, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., did not participate in this case.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chestnut v. State
538 So. 2d 820 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Gurganus v. State
451 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Stephens v. State
513 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
549 So. 2d 187, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 952, 1989 WL 117992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-state-fla-1989.