Stephens v. Smith

Nebraska Supreme Court

Stephens v. Smith

60 N.W. 1010, 42 Neb. 846, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 494

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 21, 1894

DocketNo. 5957

StatusPublished

This text of 60 N.W. 1010 (Stephens v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. Smith, 60 N.W. 1010, 42 Neb. 846, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 494 (Neb. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Irvine, C.

The only assignment of error in this case which is presented in the briefs is that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. No question of law is involved, and a statement or discussion of the facts would, therefore, be useless. An examination of the record persuades us that while the evidence on behalf of the defendant in error was neither conclusive nor very convincing, it was sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Harrison, J., having presided in court below took no part in the decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irvine, C.

The only assignment of error in this case which is presented in the briefs is that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. No question of law is involved, and a statement or discussion of the facts would, therefore, be useless. An examination of the record persuades us that while the evidence on behalf of the defendant in error was neither conclusive nor very convincing, it was sufficient to sustain the verdict, and the judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Harrison, J., having presided in court below took no part in the decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 N.W. 1010, 42 Neb. 846, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-smith-neb-1894.