Stephens v. Rush

Supreme Court of Alabama

Stephens v. Rush

454 So. 2d 984, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4390

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 20, 1984·No. 83-651·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as to Issue No. 1 (failure to plead adverse possessior) on the authority of A.R.Civ.P. 15(b) and Bischoff v. Thomasson, 400 So.2d 359 (Ala.1981); affirmed as to Issue No. 2 (sufficiency of the evidence to support claim of adverse possession) or the authority of Code 1975, § 6-5-200, et seq., and Hand v. Stanard, 392 So.2d 1157 (Ala.1980).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as to Issue No. 1 (failure to plead adverse possessior) on the authority of A.R.Civ.P. 15(b) and Bischoff v. Thomasson, 400 So.2d 359 (Ala.1981); affirmed as to Issue No. 2 (sufficiency of the evidence to support claim of adverse possession) or the authority of Code 1975, § 6-5-200, et seq., and Hand v. Stanard, 392 So.2d 1157 (Ala.1980).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Stephens v. Rush, 454 So. 2d 984, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4390 (Ala. 1984).

Pincite

454 So. 2d 984 (Stephens v. Rush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related