Stephens v. Rush

454 So. 2d 984, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4390
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJuly 20, 1984
Docket83-651
StatusPublished

This text of 454 So. 2d 984 (Stephens v. Rush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Rush, 454 So. 2d 984, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4390 (Ala. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed as to Issue No. 1 (failure to plead adverse possessior) on the authority of A.R.Civ.P. 15(b) and Bischoff v. Thomasson, 400 So.2d 359 (Ala.1981); affirmed as to Issue No. 2 (sufficiency of the evidence to support claim of adverse possession) or the authority of Code 1975, § 6-5-200, et seq., and Hand v. Stanard, 392 So.2d 1157 (Ala.1980).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bischoff v. Thomasson
400 So. 2d 359 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)
Hand v. Stanard
392 So. 2d 1157 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 So. 2d 984, 1984 Ala. LEXIS 4390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-rush-ala-1984.