Stephens v. Owens Law Group . P.A.

198 So. 3d 709, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 649, 2016 WL 231771
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 2016·No. 2D14-1321·Published

Opinion

*710 KHOUZAM, Judge.

We affirm the issues raised by. the Appellants without comment. However, Owens Law Group, P.A., and Allen Dell, P.A., concede that the trial court miscalculated the interest on the order directing the Guardian to pay them from the restricted depository. The Guardian requested that $20,000 be paid to these creditor Appel-lees. It is unclear from the appellate record how the trial court calculated the interest, but it appears that it used the wrong time period, used an incorrect inter- • est rate, or made a computational error in arriving at a total award of $23,693.53. Accordingly, we reverse the order’s award of interest, and remand to the trial court with directions to recalculate its interest award. See §§ 55.03, 687.01, Fla. Stat. (2013).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KELLY and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. Owens Law Group . P.A., 198 So. 3d 709, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 649, 2016 WL 231771 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

198 So. 3d 709 (Stephens v. Owens Law Group . P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.