Stephens v. North British & Mercantile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stephens v. North British & Mercantile Insurance

260 A.D. 881, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5209

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1940

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 881 (Stephens v. North British & Mercantile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. North British & Mercantile Insurance, 260 A.D. 881, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5209 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for an order directing that a commission issue [882]*882to take the testimony, upon written interrogatories, under oath, of a member or other representative of the firm of Sotheby & Company, and a member or other representative of the firm of Coomber & Dickin, as witnesses on behalf of the defendant, and for a stay of the trial of this action pending the return of the depositions duly executed. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the discretion vested in the learned Special Term was not exercised properly, for the record discloses a proper case for the issuance of the commission sought and for a stay of the trial pending such return. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for an order directing that a commission issue [882]*882to take the testimony, upon written interrogatories, under oath, of a member or other representative of the firm of Sotheby & Company, and a member or other representative of the firm of Coomber & Dickin, as witnesses on behalf of the defendant, and for a stay of the trial of this action pending the return of the depositions duly executed. Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the discretion vested in the learned Special Term was not exercised properly, for the record discloses a proper case for the issuance of the commission sought and for a stay of the trial pending such return. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 881, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-north-british-mercantile-insurance-nyappdiv-1940.