Stephens v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Stephens v. New York State Division of Parole

135 A.D.2d 637, 522 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52572

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 135 A.D.2d 637 (Stephens v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. New York State Division of Parole, 135 A.D.2d 637, 522 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52572 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR articles 70 and 78, inter alia, to vacate a parole violation warrant issued by the [638]*638New York State Division of Parole against the petitioner, the New York State Division of Parole appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated April 16, 1986, which granted the petition to vacate the parole warrant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the petitioner’s maximum term of imprisonment has expired, the appeal has been rendered academic. Under the circumstances, we find that this case does not present a question that would warrant an exception to the mootness doctrine. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR articles 70 and 78, inter alia, to vacate a parole violation warrant issued by the [638]*638New York State Division of Parole against the petitioner, the New York State Division of Parole appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), dated April 16, 1986, which granted the petition to vacate the parole warrant.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Since the petitioner’s maximum term of imprisonment has expired, the appeal has been rendered academic. Under the circumstances, we find that this case does not present a question that would warrant an exception to the mootness doctrine. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.2d 637, 522 N.Y.S.2d 217, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack