Stephens v. Myers

12 Pa. 302
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Pa. 302 (Stephens v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Myers, 12 Pa. 302 (Pa. 1849).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A defendant has no right by the Act of 1806 to amend his plea, after judgment on demurrer. It was his folly not to withdraw it when the first demurrer to it was withdrawn. Nor could he have the benefit of an amendment at the trial, by filing a new plea. He would trifle with his statutory privilege, were he allowed to do so.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCready v. Gans
89 A. 459 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Pa. 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-myers-pa-1849.