Stephens v. Myers

12 Pa. 302
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A defendant has no right by the Act of 1806 to amend his plea, after judgment on demurrer. It was his folly not to withdraw it when the first demurrer to it was withdrawn. Nor could he have the benefit of an amendment at the trial, by filing a new plea. He would trifle with his statutory privilege, were he allowed to do so.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. Myers, 12 Pa. 302 (Pa. 1849).

12 Pa. 302 (Stephens v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCready v. Gans
89 A. 459 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)