Stephens v. Morrison

330 So. 2d 769, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15075
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1976·No. No. BB-78·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Stephens, Relator, was tried under two counts of an information with delivering worthless bank checks. He appealed his conviction and sentence whereupon this Court reversed, reciting that there was a fatal variance between the allegata (of the charging information) and the probata. (Stephens v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1975, 324 So.2d 190)

Subsequent to our opinion and mandate in that case, the State again charged Stephens by information with violations of the same statute by issuance of the same checks involved in that case. Stephens then filed herein a Suggestion for Writ of Prohibition: on the ground of double jeopardy and we issued Rule Nisi. Upon consideration we determine that the Petition for Writ of Prohibition should be granted and the Rule Nisi made absolute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. Morrison, 330 So. 2d 769, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

330 So. 2d 769 (Stephens v. Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephens v. State
324 So. 2d 190 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)