Stephens v. Moore

The Superior Court of New York City

Stephens v. Moore

6 Sandf. 674

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedNovember 13, 1851

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Sandf. 674 (Stephens v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. Moore, 6 Sandf. 674 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

Pincite

Opinion

This was decided by

Campbell, J.,

at chambers, with the concurrence of all the justices. After the time for serving the complaint, prescribed by section 130 of the code, had expired, the plaintiff applied to one of the justices of the court, ex parte, and obtained an order giving him five days further time in which to serve the complaint. It was held that under section 405 of the code, an order enlarging the time, &c., could not be made, after the time had actually expired, unless the adverse party had notice of the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This was decided by

Campbell, J.,

at chambers, with the concurrence of all the justices. After the time for serving the complaint, prescribed by section 130 of the code, had expired, the plaintiff applied to one of the justices of the court, ex parte, and obtained an order giving him five days further time in which to serve the complaint. It was held that under section 405 of the code, an order enlarging the time, &c., could not be made, after the time had actually expired, unless the adverse party had notice of the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Sandf. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-moore-nysuperctnyc-1851.