Stephens v. Hood

17 Miss. 75
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1847·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Sharkey

delivered the opinion of the court.

A motion is made to dismiss this case; 1st, because there is no writ of error; 2d, because there should be two parties plaintiffs in error, and but one party, to wit, Stephens, is appellant; 3d because there is no appeal bond, legally executed, filed in the case; and 4th, because there is no citation returned.

The cause must be dismissed unless it is made to appear, that a writ of error issued, and in that case if it be mislaid, the parties can take an alias.

[76]*76It is not true in point of fact that but one party has appealed. The citation is in the name of both. ,

An appeal bond, or rather a writ of error bond, is only necessary when it is to operate as a supersedeas. In this case, the judgment is against the plaintiffs in execution, and there is nothing to supersede.

There is a citation directed to the sheriff of Washington county, which is returned by the sheriff, “ executed.” This is sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. Hood, 17 Miss. 75 (Mich. 1847).

17 Miss. 75 (Stephens v. Hood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.