Stephens v. Haugwitz

145 S.E. 660, 167 Ga. 352, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 153
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 17, 1928
DocketNo. 6412
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 145 S.E. 660 (Stephens v. Haugwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Haugwitz, 145 S.E. 660, 167 Ga. 352, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 153 (Ga. 1928).

Opinion

Hill, J.

Properly construed, the order of the judge in passing on the demurrer of Mrs. Haugwitz to the petition as amended, as appears in the following statement of facts, is an interlocutory order, and is not a final judgment in the case; and therefore, under the Civil Code (1910), § 6138, the bill of exceptions must be dismissed as prematurely brought. See, in this connection, Deadwyler v. Bank, 110 Ga. 511 (35 S. E. 779); Zorn v. Lamar, 71 Ga. 80 (2); 1 Cum. Supp. Enc. Dig. Ga. R. 574. The plaintiff in error is given permission to file, as exceptions pendente lite, his exceptions to the order excepted to.

Writ of error dismissed, with direction.

All the Justices concur. Meredith & James, for plaintiff. IT. IF. Gaines and J. L. Mayson, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferguson v. Randolph County
84 S.E.2d 70 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Johnson v. Motor Contract Co.
198 S.E. 59 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Smith v. Atlanta Enterprises Inc.
169 S.E. 243 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 660, 167 Ga. 352, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-haugwitz-ga-1928.