Stephens v. Griffith
25 N.Y.S. 1129, 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 934
This text of 25 N.Y.S. 1129 (Stephens v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stephens v. Griffith, 25 N.Y.S. 1129, 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 934 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
Nd opinion. Order affirmed, without • costs. Held, that the question as to the default of the respondent was addressed to the discretion of the special term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 N.Y.S. 1129, 76 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613, 52 N.Y. St. Rep. 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-griffith-nysupct-1893.