Stephens v. Graves
9 La. Ann. 239
Opinions
The facts are correctly stated in the opinion of the District Judge, and we concur with him in the conclusions that this case was not one for the appointment of a curator ad hoc. See Dupuy v. Hunt, 2 Ann., 562. Johnson v. McRae, 8 Ann., 101.
We think there is no error in the judgment of the District Court, rescinding the appointment of a curator ad hoc, and dismissing the suit; and the judgment is therefore affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stephens v. Graves, 9 La. Ann. 239 (La. 1854).
9 La. Ann. 239 (Stephens v. Graves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pugh v. Flannery
92 So. 699 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)