Stephens v. Globe Register Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Stephens v. Globe Register Co.

1934 OK 147, 30 P.2d 170, 167 Okla. 442, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 558

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 6, 1934

Docket24967

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1934 OK 147 (Stephens v. Globe Register Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stephens v. Globe Register Co., 1934 OK 147, 30 P.2d 170, 167 Okla. 442, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 558 (Okla. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was begun in the district court of Pittsburg county on the 19th day of September, 1932, and after a final judgment by the court below a motion for new trial was filed and duly overruled on the 11th day of February, 1933.

The appeal was not filed in this court until the 19th day of August, 1933, which is more than six months subsequent to the date of the order overruling motion for new trial, the last and final order entered by the court. Under the universal holdings of this court, it is without jurisdiction to review a proceeding in error not commenced within six months after the final order appealed from. Johnston v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co., 163 Okla. 197, 23 P. (2d) 188; Morrison v. Swink, 128 Okla. 97, 261 P. 209; Wheete v. City of Tulsa, 98 Okla. 4, 223 P. 634; Ginn v. Knight, 106 Okla. 4, 232 P. 936; In re Guardianship of Baptiste, 125 Okla. 184, 256 P. 520. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was begun in the district court of Pittsburg county on the 19th day of September, 1932, and after a final judgment by the court below a motion for new trial was filed and duly overruled on the 11th day of February, 1933.

The appeal was not filed in this court until the 19th day of August, 1933, which is more than six months subsequent to the date of the order overruling motion for new trial, the last and final order entered by the court. Under the universal holdings of this court, it is without jurisdiction to review a proceeding in error not commenced within six months after the final order appealed from. Johnston v. Carey, Lombard, Young & Co., 163 Okla. 197, 23 P. (2d) 188; Morrison v. Swink, 128 Okla. 97, 261 P. 209; Wheete v. City of Tulsa, 98 Okla. 4, 223 P. 634; Ginn v. Knight, 106 Okla. 4, 232 P. 936; In re Guardianship of Baptiste, 125 Okla. 184, 256 P. 520. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1934 OK 147, 30 P.2d 170, 167 Okla. 442, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-globe-register-co-okla-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack