Stephens v. Dublin
This text of 92 S.E. 871 (Stephens v. Dublin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A bank .made a return of its property for taxation under the Civil Code, § 991, which the board of assessors rejected. The bank demanded an arbitration, and arbitrators were duly selected, and the matter of valuation of the bank’s property was submitted to them. Before the arbitrators made their return, but after they had decided, upon hearing all the evidence, that the bank’s return was correct, a [63]*63person alleging himself to be a citizen and taxpayer of the county where the bank’s return was made, filed an equitable petition to enjoin the further procedure with the tax arbitration, on the ground that the law above mentioned was unconstitutional. Held, that the plaintiff showed no such interest as would authorize him to prosecute such a suit and call into question the constitutionality of the provisions of the code section above referred to. There was no error in refusing an interlocutory injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 871, 147 Ga. 62, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-dublin-ga-1917.