Stephens v. Dominos Pizza

187 So. 3d 954, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 2016 WL 1169975
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 2016
DocketNo. 1D15-5418
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 So. 3d 954 (Stephens v. Dominos Pizza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stephens v. Dominos Pizza, 187 So. 3d 954, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 2016 WL 1169975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM..

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company
192 So. 3d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 3d 954, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4550, 2016 WL 1169975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-dominos-pizza-fladistctapp-2016.