Stephens v. Dixon

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 2025·No. 1D2025-0288·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-0288 _____________________________

DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.

June 4, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus, giving leave to amend, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).

ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

David Terrence Stephens, pro se, Petitioner.

Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Stephens v. Dixon (Stephens v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.