Stephens v. Dixon
This text of Stephens v. Dixon (Stephens v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-0288 _____________________________
DAVID TERRENCE STEPHENS,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Proceedings.
June 4, 2025
PER CURIAM.
Because the trial court has ruled on Petitioner’s petition for writ of mandamus, giving leave to amend, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Granville v. State, 382 So. 3d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 2024).
ROWE, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
David Terrence Stephens, pro se, Petitioner.
Kelly R. Forren, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stephens v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stephens-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.