Stephens v. Deutsch
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 13-MAY-2025 08:20 AM Dkt. 22 ODSD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
TREVOR STEPHENS, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee, v. ARON DEUTSCH and EMILY WESSEL, Defendants/Counterclaimants/ Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, and SHERRY MATOS, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT KONA DIVISION (CIVIL NO. 3DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) On September 19, 2024, self-represented Defendants/ Counterclaimants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants Aron Deutsch and Emily Wessel (together, Appellants) filed a notice of appeal; (2) The same day, the Third Circuit district court clerk notified Appellants that the filing fees had not been paid, and warned Appellants that failure to pay the fees or request a fee waiver may result in the appeal being dismissed, or the notice of appeal being stricken; (3) The record on appeal was due on or before November 18, 2024, see Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 11(b)(1), but was not filed because Appellants failed to pay the filing fees or obtain a fee waiver; (4) On November 19, 2024, the appellate clerk entered a default of the record on appeal, informing Appellants that the time to docket the appeal had expired, Appellants had not paid the filing fees or obtained an order allowing Appellants to NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the matter would be brought to the court's attention on November 29, 2024, for action that may include dismissal of the appeal, and Appellants could seek relief from default by motion; and (5) Appellants have not taken any further action in this appeal. An appeal may be dismissed where the record on appeal has not been prepared because the appellant failed to pay the required fees or obtain an order allowing the appellant to proceed in forma pauperis. HRAP Rule 11(b)(2), (c)(2). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, May 13, 2025.
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge
/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stephens v. Deutsch (Stephens v. Deutsch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.